![]() |
![]() |
|
With Commentary by Harry W. Daniels |
|
|
As a founding nation we have a right to determine our own future. When the Metis Nation under the leadership of Louis Riel brought the West into Confederation it did so on the understanding that it was a partner in Confederation. What else could our ancestors believe after they had opened up the West to trade and development, upheld law and order on the plains and resisted offers to join the United States? We came into Confederation as partners and believed that this was confirmed by the Manitoba Act. Since then we have seen our special rights in the Manitoba Act ignored if not wiped out by a stroke of the pen. We will no longer accept this non-recognition. We know what our contributions are to this country and on what terms we entered Confederation. As a founding nation we have a right to determine our own future. When the Metis Nation under the leadership of Louis Riel brought the West into Confederation it did so on the understanding that it was a partner in Confederation. What else could our ancestors believe after they had opened up the West to trade and development, upheld law and order on the plains and resisted offers to join the United States? |
![]() Gabriel Dumont, Metis Military Leader |
|
We came into Confederation as partners and believed that this was confirmed by the Manitoba Act. Since then we have seen our special rights in the Manitoba Act ignored if not wiped out by a stroke of the pen. We will no longer accept this non-recognition. We know what our contributions are to this country and on what terms we entered Confederation. We are not an ethnic or immigrant group which
leaves foreign countries to improve its life in Canada. We built a nation
on this soil and were prepared to join Canada so as to build a larger
and stronger nation. But we maintain the right to stay in or get out of
Confederation. Our goal is to remain in Confederation but as an equal
partner. |
|
|
|
|
| As
partners in Confederation we must be involved in the steps leading to changes
in the constitution in the same way as the premiers of the provinces. We
cannot accept being treated as just another minority group who are to be
consulted at the whim of the English and French. And for good reason.
The original constitution of Canada, the British North America
Act, did make special provisions for the lands of all Native peoples. But
we were not part of the steps leading to the writing of the British North
America Act and our wishes and concerns were not as clearly spelled out
in the British North America Act as they should have been if we had been
fully involved. We cannot assume that references to us in the highest law
of the land protect our rights. History tells us otherwise.
Whatever guarantees given us by governments in the past turned out to be empty promises. They were not strong enough to prevent the Metis Nation from being reduced to a landless people. They were not strong enough to prevent thousands of Indians from being made "non-status" by a simple piece of legislation, the Indian Act. |
|
| Only by participating as partners with the premiers of the provinces in the changes to the constitution can we hope to enshrine and clearly define our rights. Only then can we feel assured that these rights will be protected from those who wish to take them away from us by whatever means. We would be the first to support changes to the constitution of Canada but only if these changes benefit our people and we must be involved in the re-writing of a new constitution itself. |
|
|
|
|
That
We Have the Right To Guranteed Representation
IN ALL LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLIES
|
|
|
In order for us to take our rightful place in Canadian society we must be allowed to participate in the political process of the country. As one of the founding nations of Canada, we are entitled to a partnership in ruling the country. This was our belief in 1870 when we brought Manitoba into Confederation on the condition that we be guaranteed representation in the House of Commons and the Senate. The loss of our rights has meant that we are considered ordinary citizens when voting for representatives to sit in assemblies. But there we have little or no chance to make our views known. Our population is thinly spread across the country and without guaranteed representation we will not be able to elect our people to assemblies. We must gain the right to represent ourselves in these assemblies if we are to preserve our identity as a distinct national group. What we are seeking and what we have always sought is a guarantee of a fixed number of seats for Native peoples in both federal and provincial legislative assemblies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| We are part of the land. It is the source of our identity. For us to reject the land and abandon it to those who do not care for it is to deny our heritage. We have lived on and used the land since time immemorial. This close bond with the land was recognized by earlier governments. The Royal Proclamation of 1763 recognized the Aboriginal title to the land of Indian people. The Manitoba Act of 1870 and the Dominion Lands Acts of 1874 and 1879 recognized a Metis title to the land based on our having been the masters and defenders of the land. But while our right to the land has been recognized, it has not been respected. We have been the victims of land grabbers, politicians and today of resource corporations. Our traditional respect for and use of the land has been ignored by those whose feelings for the land go no further than the wealth and votes which can be reaped from its development. We whose purpose in life is tied to the land have become a landless people. We have come to be seen as squatters on our own land. We will never give up our right to the land and its natural resources. To foresake the land is to foresake ourselves. | ![]() Metis Hunters on the Plains, 1913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| We who have
lived and still live on the land and depend on the land to satisfy many
of our needs must have the first say in how the land is to be developed.
At the same time we are not against genuine economic development. We know the needs of the modern world and have no wish to hoard vital resources. All we seek is the right to take part in the development of these resources as partners and not as victims. As partners we should share in the management and ownership of the corporations which take wealth out of our land. We should have representation on all those boards and committees which decide how development is to take place. We should be guaranteed a share of the profits of the companies which operate on our traditional lands. Only then can we fulfill our obligation to the land and future generations. We must build today for a better tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
| We believe it is our right as a people
with a rich history and culture to preserve our identity while we participate
as partners in the development of Canada. In the past we were denied this
right. If we were to succeed in the eyes of the larger society we were expected
to give up our identity and beliefs. We were expected to assimilate.
If we are to preserve and enrich our own Native identity and to contribute to the growth of a truly Canadian identity we must have control of our destiny. Culture and identity are not things which can be preserved in a jar. They must grow if they are to survive. However, our culture and identity can grow only if we have control of those institutions which shape our lives and outlook. We believe that our own people, by banding together into strong organizations, can best manage those institutions through which we communicate with each other and to the rest of Canadian society, through which we educate ourselves and our children, and through which we express ourselves in art, beliefs and recreation. |
|
|
|
![]() Louis Riel Dancers, Edmonton, 1979 |
|
| history and to embrace ideas which make them ashamed of our way of life? We place great faith in education. It is the hope of our people, the hope for a better future. But without the right to educate our children in our own history and culture, there is little hope for our survival as a people - only a future where our children can succeed in school by turning their backs on their own people. We have too much faith in our children and in our future to doom our children to this fate. If education is the road to progress we must pave the way. |
|
|
|
|
| We are an historical national minority
with a right to special status in Confederation. We have the right to remain
separate and distinct from both English and French Canada and to develop
as a people according to our own destiny.
We have a right to self- determination
as a distinct national group. We are not just another ethnic group in
Canada. As partners in Confederation, we have the right to stay in Confederation
or get out of it. We decided not to exercise this right in full when we
brought Manitoba into Confederation in 1870. We believed in Confederation
then and turned down offers to join the United States. We thought Confederation
would allow us to develop
and prosper as a distinct people,. as a partner in Confederation. History
shows that our hopes were not fulfilled.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
The major objectives of the Native Council are to ensure that the special social and economic needs of Native people are fulfilled and that the special rights of Canada's first citizens are recognized and respected. Through the collective efforts of the Native Council and its affiliates government programs have been created to improve the social and economic conditions of Native people. The Native Council co-ordinates landclaims research which is being undertaken |
| across Canada to substantiate the historical, legal and moral claims of Metis and non-status Indians. As well the Native Council has assumed a vanguard role in asserting the special status rights of Native people in Canada. |
|
Photos courtesy of
the Public Archives of Canada,
Hudson's Bay Company Archives,
Provincial Archives of Alberta,
Dorothy Daniels,
John Valentine, CP
Press
|
| |